|
The article presents a successful experience
of implementing learner-centered approach in undergraduate courses.
Three main concepts of having the student participation in organizing
instructional process are described and discussed including planning
their learning outcomes, designing their learning activities, and
determining methods of evaluation for their learning performance.
Once a course framework has been set,
each student submits his/her complete learning plan. To fulfill
the intended outcomes, the student has involved various learning
methods such as self-study, role-playing, project-based activity,
problem-based activity, e-learning, etc. Portfolios of learning
experience have been proposed by the students to be an indicator
for evaluation of their performance along with oral presentation
and some expected attributes.
In regular classroom period, the students
come to present their on-going tasks, ask for suggestions and comments,
organize in-class activities as scheduled and receive formative
evaluation. Times spent out of classroom for each student are varied
depending on his/her design of activities and capability to fulfill
the outcomes. They may work as individuals or groups. Therefore,
an authentic assessment has been applied to evaluate students' performance.
The approach has been experimented and
developed in 2 courses that are different in its nature as specified
by curriculum. One is a 2(2-0) credits course for the second year
students, designated as having two theoretical or lecturing hours.
Another is a 2(1-2) credits course for the third year students,
having 1 theoretical hour and 2 practice hours.
The traditional methods of teaching
these courses in the past are described to compare with the learner-centered
approach. Techniques used in encouraging students to think and actively
participate in learning process are explained. Comparison of learning
outcomes between the two approaches is presented so that significant
changes of student capability and attitudes in favor of learner-centered
approach are demonstrated. Also, effects on the teacher, the students,
and the community are discussed.
The two courses organizing in the year
2000 shows satisfactory outcomes. Then, the approach has been repeated
again in 2001 using the same course with a new group. The results
are also satisfaction and encourage more implementation in other
courses
|